Hello friends!
I was chatting with Glynnis MacNicol—who’s newsletter you should read here and whose memoir about Paris, sex, and not giving a fuck you should definitely read—about marketing, work, results, and the fruits of our labor. About how you can do everything and get all the media attention and even sell lots of books, and there’s still a marker of success you don’t reach. For some it’s hitting the best seller list (or a best seller list) and for some it’s a big review or placement in Target or whatever. You can do all the things you’re supposed to do as an author and XYZ thing still won’t happen. We both wanted to figure out why.
Let me back up. We’ve talked in this newsletter before about how frustrating marketing your book can be. There’s no playbook and no one knows what works. What works for one book will not work for another book, even if you’re the author of both. Everyone says get a platform!!! but the how and why and when of that is also very ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and those numbers don’t turn into book sales anyway so even more ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. But also? You still have to do it. You still have to market your own book, even though there’s a whole department doing that at your publisher and sometimes you can barely tell what they’ve done, are doing, or will do.
It also feels like publishers are leaving authors out to dry with marketing and publicity. No only do you have to do all this stuff, with little or no guidance, but you bear the brunt of it if nothing works. If you have a poor sales track record, it can make it harder to sell future books. This seems very, very unfair! And it is! But this unfairness doesn’t stem from the publisher gatekeeping the secret information of how to market a book and twiddling their mustaches. I don’t dedicate my life to defending the actions of multi-national corporations, but I will say that most publishing teams really do want your book to sell. It’s their job! That’s why they bought it in the first place.
There’s a lot of stuff in publishing that we don’t have. Enough payroll and employees to really dedicate the time necessary to make a book break out and sell a lot of copies. Data on what efforts lead to sales and what does not. Reliable trend forecasting (is that even a thing?) that helps publishers focus their lists and set authors up for success (or at least mitigate low sales). All the things we don’t have when it comes to marketing books supposes that there is something out there that would always lead to success. That there is a solid answer to the question how do we sell this book.
But there’s not! There are no answers! Publishers can usually only tell you what sold a book, not what will sell it. Books are not bottles of Coke. We can’t know that mysteries (/Cokes) sell more in the summer because everyone’s at the beach (/it’s hot outside) because your mystery (bottle of Coke) is not the same as that other mystery (/bottle of Coke) that came out last summer. It’s easy for Coke to say let’s advertise more when it’s hot outside because they’ve been selling the same damn thing for over a hundred years! All mysteries are not the same.
So what’s happening then? Why doesn’t marketing “work?” The efforts authors and publishers use to market and promote a book don’t “work” insofar as we can’t tie a specific action to actual book sales. We can’t say1 this magazine interview lead to 57 sales. This is annoying but think about it—when has that kind of marketing ever worked on you? We’re all savvy shoppers by now. We know when an ad or review or influencer campaign has been designed to present us with a thing someone wants us to buy. I clicked one ad for gold jewelry on Instagram a few weeks ago and now my ads are wall to wall gold jewelry. And I’m actually planning to buy something soon! But not from those ads. From a place I’ve already bought from that isn’t serving me any ads on Insta. All those marketing dollars are wasted, in terms of those companies getting me to buy something from them. But they were successful in making me aware of their brands, and maybe one day down the line, I might buy something from them or recommend them to someone else.
In book publishing, that’s successful marketing. Name recognition and awareness. People saying “oh, I’ve seen that book! I hear it’s good” is worth almost as much as a direct sale from an ad or post. All those posts and mentions and articles and reposts and whatever eventually add up to someone getting closer to buying your book when they’re just running into B&N last minute before their vacation or adding things to their cart. I know that publishing houses, and authors, don’t measure success this way, and that it’s mostly focused on sales right when the book comes out, but long term, this is actually what success means. Long term, it’s what keeps your career going.
When you’re faced with the confusing world of marketing your own book and you have no idea what to do, step back and think about what does and doesn’t work on you, the reader, the consumer, when it comes to buying a book. Focus your efforts there as much as you can, and deemphasize the things you don’t care about. It might not “work,” but it will make the work of marketing at least a little more clear.
OXOXOXOXO,
Kate
Unless it’s a tracked URL controlled by the publisher/author and we can see referral traffic but that doesn’t happen that much and also doesn’t account for the person who clicked the link, didn’t buy the book, but bought it two weeks later IRL at B&N.
I have a history in traditional publishing and so have a background for the kind of thinking put forth in this essay. I also have a growing body of evidence that this essay proves why the traditional publishing industry is losing its grip on the avidly reading public.
If you think book marketing doesn't work or can't be decoded, you haven't broken marketing into its separate parts.
Marketing is the umbrella term for a group of behaviors, and so if it is used as a synonym for a single aspect of the marketing process, it would be pretty confusing.
Public relations, media planning, pricing, distribution, sales, customer experience, and advertising all combine to create marketing.
Using one term at the expense of all the others is kind of like going to your doctor with stomach pain and being told, "Your health is bad." And being told we have no idea what marketing behaviors lead to success is like that same doctor saying, "We have no idea why you're sick."
The truth is more reassuring. Just like every component of health can be tested, every component of marketing can be tested. Sometimes the path to success is as frustrating as the path to revived health, but to the one who searches, answers are available.
As with diet and its impact on overall health, advertising tends to be the marketing behavior with the most dramatic, visible benefits so it's typically the lever most heavily pressed, but it's also the most costly, and leads to the most heart break. After all, if you advertise a turd to enough consumers, some of them will buy so they can feed it to their pet beetle.
Other arms of marketing cost less and produce compounding effects over time. Lift weights for a lifetime, avoid osteoporosis. Post on social media for a lifetime, build a loyal following. Every day you take off, you lose some compounding effect. Do you know anyone who posts or lifts daily?
There's obviously a ton to unpack on this subject, but I found the thesis of the essay to so misrepresent the truth about marketing that it was worth speaking.
While it's true we can't control the genes we were born with any more than we can control the market our book launches into, we can control enough of the variables to market our way to becoming a household name. Most of us aren't willing to do the hard work of figuring it out though.
Thanks for this Kate. Excellent take.
The paucity of predictive and prescriptive data in the publishing industry drives me nuts, but I think there's just too many variables to tease apart (or else some company would have already done it and deprived Nielsen of a pot of gold).
Just maybe, when fed decades of sales and other pertinent customer data, an AI will recognise these subtle patterns and be an unlikely saviour for authors, agents and editors.